Tuesday, April 27, 2010

English 101.25 Extra Credit - No Time

My six word story comes from a song by The Guess Who. Here is the extra credit prompt:

"Write your own six word story that will serve as the title to your portfolio. let it somehow communicate your writing journey, the subject of your papers in your portfolio, etc. let your imagination run wild. have fun with it. then, to actually get the extra credit, you'll need to provide a brief explanation (a short paragraph) that tells your reader how this six word story is representative of the experience that is your portfolio."

Seasons change and so do I

This six word story is representative of my writing journey this semester because I began not looking foward to English 101 class at all. I knew I was a decent writer, but not the greatest in the world. But throughout the entire course this semester, I was able to focus more to improve my writing, and figured that putting your own spin on writing is a good thing. It gives your words a unique voice that isn't like the standard 5-paragraph essay. This relates to my portfolio because in the three papers I selected, I had to change all of them drastically. By this, I mean I originally had an idea I thought would serve it's purpose in the topic. However, by getting some input from Rachel and consulting my own thoughts, I changed the overall meaning of every paper. Sure it's a ton of work, and thus far I'm only finished entirely changing one paper. It will be a lot of work to put my portfolio together, but in the end I believe it will be worth it.

Thursday, April 22, 2010

English 101.25 - Miracle

It's gonna take a miracle to do my best these final 2 weeks of school. Anyways, here's the prompt for the week:

"Out of the papers you are putting into your English portfolio, which one do you think shows your best work and which one do you think needs to be edited the most? Explain why. Be specific. Provide examples of your best and weakest areas."

In my portfolio, I am choosing the American Lit Essay, the Personal Analysis Essay, and the Research Paper. The one that I believe will show my best work is the Personal Analysis Essay for a variety of reasons. First, this is the paper I am most interested in, mainly because I am talking about sports and competitiveness; two things I can really relate to. Besides that, I'm mentioning a player from my favorite sports team, the Boston Red Sox. I also believe that the player, Jon Lester, and I have a few things in common besides our first names (even though my name is Jonathan). The best area in this paper definitely comes from my introduction where I'm relating competitions with my brother throughout our lives. My weakest area is connecting the part about Lester to my own story. Hopefully I'm able to work on it a bit and change it within the next week.

The paper that needs to be edited the most is essentially a tie between the other two, but I will give it to my American Literature Essay. This is because Rachel helped me come with an interesting spin on the paper that I can totally make my own. Originally, the essay was basically like everyone else's; they talk about Engdahl and give a clear example of literature as support. I'm going to take a different route, in regards to that literature isn't as big as it was in the past, due to technological innovations that have happened over the past few decades. Currently, I don't have any strong or weak areas in the paper because I haven't entirely started to hammer everything out.

Hopefully I can get all 3 papers done, along with the other 2 that I have to finish for other classes. Best wishes to everyone else with their finals and portfolios!

Thursday, April 15, 2010

English 101.25 - The Adventure

I picked the title of this blog as one of my favorite songs by Angels & Airwaves. Also, Chris went on an adventure into the wild. Here's the prompt:

"Describe the kind of things you think Chris would do if he did make it out of the wild alive? Would he contact his parents? What would he say to them? Would he get a job, go back to school?

Back up your answers with examples from the text that make you feel this way. "

If Chris did happen to make it out of the wild alive, I don't believe he would have contacted any of his family. As it says in the very first epigraph of Into the Wild, Chris writes to Wayne saying, "Please return all mail I receive to the sender. It might be a very long time before I return South." By this, Chris was not planning on going back where his family lived. I believe he would get a job, due to all of the previous jobs he had taken along his journey. Chris would have worked for the sake of working, and having something to do. Eventually, just as he had, he would grow tired of working and just go about with no money. Potentially he could go on other venture out into the wilderness, or immigrate to another country. He would not have returned to school, as he did not like some of the rules and regulations that students had to abide by. No one knows the exact answers to what Chris would have done if he survived Alaska, and all we can do is guess.

Friday, April 2, 2010

English 101.25 - Maps

Within the first sentence of reading the prompt, I immediately thought of a song from Rock Band called "Maps" by the Yeah Yeah Yeahs. Anyways, here is the prompt for this week's blog:

"At the beginning of chapter 17 of Into the Wild, author Jon Krakauer refers to the fact that McCandless did not have a topographic map a few times. In fact, McCandless did not have any map at all (174). This brings up the issue of how prepared Chris McCandless was for such an adventure. Krakauer often brings up letters from angry Alaskans or outdoorsmen who wrote letters complaining about this very issue, something that they saw as elementary knowledge and common sense. It is extremely difficult to argue that not having a map is not a sign of being unprepared when going out into the wilderness. However, it is important to note, as Krakauer does, that Chris had no intention of being 'prepared' in a conventional way with modern equipment (174). As we approach the end of the this documentation of McCandless's journey, has your overall view of Chris McCandless changed at all regarding this topic? Do you think that this is a sign of arrogance, ignorance, or just a human being challenging themselves? The chapter appears to be heavily defending Chris's mistakes in the wild, while still acknowledging them. Are Krakauer's methods effective for you in this case?"

Personally, my view of Chris McCandless has changed from the beginning of the book. Originally I believe McCandless to be extremely foolish, but reading the entire story has revealed new information. The whole acknowledgement of the maps towards the end provides an example that Chris did not bring what other people might not bring on a journey. He was not trying to bring a huge backpack with all the gear he needed in order to survive for years and years comfortably; he wanted to live off the land. Since the bus in Alaska was part of the land, he ended up calling it home becase that was basically his best option. Anyways, the map could be viewed as a human challenging themselves, because Chris very much challenged himself along every step of the journey. Additionally, the methods that Krakauer uses in the book are effective. At first I thought this information would have been more useful at the beginning and that it took too long to reveal. But going through each chapter how it was placed provides good context for the finally revealing of everything at the end. Krakauer has a well-written novel, and it was a pleasure reading it for the first time.

On a different note off topic, I like how in the closing chapters that Krakauer discusses McCandless's death and how reports were confirming all of his investigations, even though they were not right at the start. But Krakauer really did a ton of investigative work in order to figure out that those seeds in mixture with the mold would cause to die, instead of the original cause of death as starvation.

Friday, March 26, 2010

English 101.25 - A Message

The topic for this blog comes from the point where all of our books/shows/movies are supposed to convey a certain message that impacts or influences American culture, or culture in general. Here's the prompt:

What is your topic for the research paper? How does this topic currently impact American culture (or another country, if that's where you're going with this)? How is your book/show/movie different from all of the other books/shows/movies out there like it? How is it unique? What specific cultural issue will you be addressing in your research essay and why is it relevant TODAY?

My topic for the research paper is the movie Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. I decided to pick this particular film because I remember as a child going to Disneyland and Disneyworld, and that those places made me really happy. All of the makings put into those places had to start somewhere, and the first animated film by Walt Disney was Snow White. Disney impacts the entire world because the messages it conveys in the films, such as perserverance, determination, and accomplishing goals. All of the Disney animated films reach out to children in some way, shape, or form. Snow White is different from all the other movies out there because this is where the Disney legacy started, inspiring others to produce animated films and being creative. In my essay I will be specifically addressing the messages that Disney movies convey to children. These Disney films continue to bring revenues from the movie theaters and inspire other attractions at the parks worldwide as well.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

English 101.25 - Ramble On

I had to throw a Led Zeppelin title into one of my blogs. Basically, using more description and all that is rambling on in my opinion.

Here's the prompt:

"From the reading last Tuesday, what is the author Patricia Hampl's purpose in writing about description and word choice in, The Dark Art of Description? Why are the last few paragraphs, about the story she tells with one of her students, significant to the purpose?"

Patricia Hampl's purpose of her work, The Dark Art of Description, is to make others realize the alteration of language can really impact what one writes. In her work, Hampl says, "I was painfully aware of just how specific every bit of writing is, full of choices and chances." What she means by this is that every single placement of a word or punctuation has a significant influence on what the reader will read. She mentions about whether to put a comma or dash in certain areas. Additionally, she give an example of a story writer by the name of J.F. Poewrs who spent an entire morning deciding whether to put the word "chum" or "pal" to describe how a character referred to a friend. These descriptions play a role in the "Show, don't tell" aspect that is taught in introductory writing workshops. Still, Hampl begins to tell about Alfred Kazin, who published a "memoir of his boyhood in Brooklyn, A Walker in the City". Kazin was able to show and tell in his writing, thus making it more effective. All in all, description can come in many forms, as the images in peoples' minds can involve many possibilities due to what they have encountered in their lifetimes.

Going along the lines of the last few paragraphs of this work and the story told about the student, the purpose outlines that everyone has a point of view. People don't necessarily have the same ideas, thoughts, words, or can demonstrate them in the same ways. So everyone's voice is important. Individuals who are capable of writing can come up with fabulous ways to convey their ideas, even though at times it seems they have come to a dead end. No two people have the same exact life in every aspect, whether it be growing up, their childhood, or even what they do on a daily basis. Just using that individuality that each person has is the key to description.

Friday, March 5, 2010

English 101.25 - Stronger

Yes I know the title is from a Kanye West song, but I had a real difficult time figuring out what the title of this post would be. Here's the prompt:

"Do you think it was a good idea to add the chapters about Walt (Chris’ father) and Krakauer as individuals? What did it do for you for your views of the novel? Did anything change your opinion or did it support what you already thought? Why?"

So I guess it's back to talking about Into the Wild and all that good stuff. Anyways, for Krakauer to add the chapters about Walt and himself as individuals were good. However, I would have preferred that the chapter about Walt be placed earlier to get a better sense of Chris' parents. But I suppose the way they are placed is beneficial for the story in the sense that it does not give any information away until later on in the novel. These accounts have impacted my view on Chris, who I believed at the beginning of the story was just a kid who was foolish in venturing out to Alaska. Towards the beginning of the book gave me the persception that Chris was begging for someone to save his life even though he knew what he was getting himself into. I based my 'judgment' more-so on the decision instead of the motive behind it. Also, seeing how Krakauer went out like Chris did showed a lot about his character and that various circumstances can happen to alter different situations. Take for example the incident with the tent; it put Krakauer in a really bad spot out in the cold without a protective shield on his tent. Some things could have happened to Chris that could have been essentially unpreventable, but we don't know entirely.

I wish I had more to say since this feels like a short blog. I guess I'm not as interested in talking about this topic this week.